VMAF: Netflix's Perceptual Quality Analysis for Modern Video

Overview

VMAF (Video Multi-method Assessment Fusion) represents the cutting edge of perceptual video quality assessment, combining machine learning with human visual perception modeling. Developed by Netflix, VMAF provides more accurate quality predictions than traditional metrics, enabling video engineers to optimize encoding for actual viewing experience rather than mathematical fidelity alone.

Key Takeaways

• Master VMAF implementation for advanced perceptual quality assessment
• Understand machine learning-based quality prediction advantages
• Optimize encoding workflows using VMAF-driven quality insights
• Integrate VMAF with modern cloud-native quality assessment pipelines

What is VMAF?

VMAF uses machine learning models trained on human visual perception data to predict video quality scores that correlate better with subjective viewing experience than traditional metrics like PSNR or SSIM. This approach enables more accurate quality assessment for modern content optimization workflows.

VMAF Key Features

• Perceptual Accuracy: Machine learning models trained on human perception data for accurate quality prediction
• Content Adaptivity: Quality assessment that adapts to different content types and viewing conditions
• Temporal Analysis: Frame-by-frame quality analysis with temporal pooling for comprehensive assessment
• Model Variants: Multiple VMAF models optimized for different resolutions and viewing scenarios

Why Use VMAF for Advanced Perceptual Quality Assessment?

Benefits

1. Accurate Quality Prediction - Better correlation with human perception than traditional mathematical metrics
2. Encoding Optimization - Data-driven encoding decisions based on actual perceptual quality impact
3. Content-Aware Analysis - Quality assessment that considers content characteristics and viewing context

Common Challenges

• Computational Complexity: Optimize VMAF calculation with appropriate sampling and parallel processing
• Model Selection: Choose appropriate VMAF models based on content resolution and viewing conditions
• Integration Complexity: Implement VMAF integration with existing quality assessment and encoding workflows

Step-by-Step Guide: Professional VMAF Analysis Workflow

Prerequisites

• FFmpeg with libvmaf support compiled
• VMAF model files and reference content
• Understanding of perceptual quality fundamentals

Step 1: Basic VMAF Calculation

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null -

Calculate basic VMAF scores using default model to assess perceptual quality between reference and distorted video content.

Step 2: Model-Specific Analysis

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi "libvmaf=model_path=/usr/local/share/model/vmaf_v0.6.1.pkl" -f null -

Use specific VMAF models optimized for different resolution ranges and content types for more accurate quality assessment.

Step 3: Detailed Quality Reporting

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi "libvmaf=log_path=vmaf_report.json:log_fmt=json" -f null -

Generate comprehensive VMAF reports with frame-by-frame analysis and statistical summaries for detailed quality insights.

Step 4: Multi-Scale Analysis

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi "libvmaf=enable_transform=true" -f null -

Enable multi-scale analysis to assess quality across different spatial frequencies and detail levels.

Advanced VMAF Techniques

Encoding Parameter Optimization

for crf in 18 22 26 30; do ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -c:v libx264 -crf $crf test_crf$crf.mp4; vmaf_score=$(ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -i test_crf$crf.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null - 2>&1 | grep 'VMAF score:' | awk '{print $3}'); echo "CRF $crf: VMAF $vmaf_score"; done

Use VMAF scores to guide encoding parameter optimization and identify optimal quality-bitrate balance points.

Content-Type Quality Analysis

for content in animation live_action graphics; do ffmpeg -i reference_$content.mp4 -i encoded_$content.mp4 -lavfi "libvmaf=log_path=vmaf_$content.json:log_fmt=json" -f null -; done

Analyze VMAF performance across different content types to understand quality assessment effectiveness and optimization opportunities.

Real-World Use Cases

Use Case 1: Streaming Ladder Optimization

Scenario: Optimize adaptive bitrate ladders using perceptual quality metrics Solution: Use VMAF to validate and optimize bitrate ladder quality levels

for bitrate in 500k 1M 2M 4M; do ffmpeg -i master.mp4 -b:v $bitrate ladder_$bitrate.mp4; ffmpeg -i master.mp4 -i ladder_$bitrate.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null -; done

Use Case 2: Quality Threshold Validation

Scenario: Establish VMAF-based quality thresholds for content validation Solution: Define acceptable VMAF score ranges for different content categories

vmaf_score=$(ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i encoded.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null - 2>&1 | grep 'VMAF score:' | awk '{print $3}'); if (( $(echo "$vmaf_score > 80" | bc -l) )); then echo "Quality acceptable"; fi

Use Case 3: Codec Comparison Analysis

Scenario: Compare codec efficiency using perceptual quality metrics Solution: Use VMAF to evaluate codec performance at equivalent quality levels

for codec in libx264 libx265 libaom-av1; do ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -c:v $codec -crf 23 ${codec}_output.mp4; ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -i ${codec}_output.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null -; done

VMAF vs Alternatives

Feature	VMAF	PSNR/SSIM	DMOS	Probe.dev API
Perceptual Accuracy
Industry Adoption
Computational Cost

Performance and Best Practices

Optimization Tips

• Select Appropriate Models: Choose VMAF models that match your content resolution and viewing conditions
• Validate Against Subjective Tests: Correlate VMAF scores with subjective quality assessments for your specific use cases
• Optimize Computation Resources: Use sampling and parallel processing to manage VMAF computational requirements

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Wrong Model Selection: Use models trained for your specific resolution range and content type
• Ignoring Content Characteristics: Consider content type when interpreting VMAF scores and setting quality thresholds
• Over-Reliance on Single Metric: Combine VMAF with other quality metrics for comprehensive quality assessment

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Issue 1: VMAF Calculation Errors

Symptoms: FFmpeg VMAF filter failures or crashes Solution: Verify libvmaf compilation and ensure model files are accessible and valid

Issue 2: Unexpected VMAF Scores

Symptoms: VMAF scores don't correlate with expected quality Solution: Check content alignment and verify appropriate model selection for content characteristics

Issue 3: Performance Issues

Symptoms: VMAF calculation takes too long or consumes excessive resources Solution: Implement frame sampling or parallel processing to optimize VMAF calculation performance

Industry Standards and Compliance

VMAF Model Standards

Use appropriate VMAF models validated for specific resolution ranges and content types

Quality Correlation Standards

Establish correlation between VMAF scores and subjective quality assessment

Integration Standards

Implement VMAF integration following best practices for production workflows

Cloud-Native Alternative: Probe.dev API

While VMAF is powerful for local analysis, modern media workflows demand cloud-scale solutions. Probe.dev transforms VMAF's capabilities into a scalable, API-first service.

Why Choose Probe.dev Over VMAF?

Scalability

• VMAF: Limited to local processing power
• Probe.dev: Elastic cloud infrastructure handles any file size

⚡ Performance

• VMAF: VMAF requires significant computational resources and appropriate model selection for accurate results
• Probe.dev: 58% faster analysis with optimized cloud processing

🧠 Intelligence

• VMAF: Raw technical data only
• Probe.dev: ML-enhanced insights trained on 1B+ media assets

Integration

• VMAF: CLI scripting and error handling required
• Probe.dev: Clean REST API with comprehensive error handling

Migration Example: VMAF → Probe.dev

Traditional VMAF Approach:

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi libvmaf -f null -

Probe.dev API Approach:

const response = await fetch('https://api.probe.dev/v1/probe/file', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Authorization': 'Bearer YOUR_API_KEY' },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    url: 'https://your-storage.com/video.mp4',
    tools: ['vmaf']
  })
});

Try Probe.dev Free →

Additional Resources

Documentation

• VMAF Official Documentation
• Probe.dev VMAF Integration Guide
• Industry Best Practices

Tools and Libraries

• FFmpeg libvmaf
• VMAF Python Library
• Netflix Quality Research

Community

• VMAF Community Forum
• Video Engineering Discord
• Probe.dev Developer Community

Conclusion

VMAF provides state-of-the-art perceptual quality assessment that better aligns with human visual perception than traditional metrics. While VMAF offers superior accuracy for quality optimization, cloud-native solutions provide automated VMAF integration, intelligent model selection, and scalable quality assessment that simplifies implementation and improves workflow efficiency.

Next Steps

1. Implement VMAF-based quality assessment in your encoding validation workflows
2. Establish VMAF score thresholds and quality criteria for your content types
3. Integrate VMAF with encoding optimization and adaptive bitrate ladder development
4. Try Probe.dev's cloud-native VMAF alternative →

---

About the Author: The Probe DEV team consists of media engineering experts with decades of experience in video processing, cloud infrastructure, and API development. Founded by the creator of Encoding.com, we're passionate about modernizing media analysis workflows.

Related Articles:

• PSNR vs SSIM Analysis
• Video Quality Metrics
• Encoding Optimization